License Compliance Services, Also Known as PicScout Inc. – a Suspected Extortionist

Information on License Compliance Services, PicScout and Getty Images

January 12, 2017. I will add some additional information here about this article’s content.

Some people have asked me, how do I know that License Compliance Services was not a registered company, that License Compliance Services is part of PicScout and that Getty Images owns PicScout.

You can do a search for the following terms:

picscout getty images

This brings up relevant information. Initially, PicScout had information about being a wholly owned, independent subsidiary of Getty Images on their main website as well. Now they are trying to distance themselves both from Getty Images and from License Compliance Services. However, at the time of writing this article, they still have the following page up, Getty Images Acquires PicScout, which states that PicScout is “a leader in identifying image use, metadata and licensing information on the web” and that the objective is to ensure a stronger overall content licensing industry.

Further, at the time I posted the article below, License Compliance Services was not registered as a company anywhere in the U.S. They just fraudulently tried to appear as an independent company.

In addition, the demand letter that I received from License Compliance Services asked me to make a check payable to PicScout. (Of course, I did not send License Compliance Services / PicScout any check. Why would I? If anybody owes money, then in this situation it’s PicScout that forced me to work on this case with its unvalidated demands and threats. Thus, I sent PicScout an invoice, which is unpaid and, thus, continues to accrue interest.)

Better Business Bureau website states as well, that Getty Images aliases are PicScout and License Compliance Services.

Further, at the time of posting this article, License Compliance Services and PicScout shared exactly the same address and business office. Since then, PicScout has removed its US address from its website and left only the Israeli address. Similarly, PicScout has removed reference to being a wholly owned, independent subsidiary of Getty Images from its main website.

This shows that PicScout’s management team is trying to distance themselves from Getty Images and from License Compliance Services. Perhaps PicScout’s management team members have started to realize that terrorizing the public is not such a good idea after all.

Further, PicScout is apparently trying to reposition itself and to create a different brand. At the time they made a deal with Getty Images in 2011, PicScout positioned itself as “a leader in identifying image use, metadata and licensing information on the web.” Now, PicScout is trying to position itself as an information technology company that “showcases an industry leading image intelligence system.” So, they don’t want to appear as being part of an extortionist ring that has caused distress to millions of people – that’s not good for the business image!

These are the clarifying comments that I hope you will find useful. Below is the original article and a copy of the letter I sent to PicScout.

As a Consumer, You Have a Choice to Make

Another potential copyright abuser popped up – License Compliance Services, which is simply a team that is part of PicScout Inc. License Compliance Services is not an independent company, but is using bogus information, trying to appear as an independent company. PicScout Inc. is a wholly owned, independent subsidiary of Getty Images.

This License Compliance Services bogus entity is asking me to pay for an image that I have been using on my personal website since 2011. I received this image from the same sources that I did the rest of the images. Below is my response letter.

If you receive a letter with unvalidated monetary demands, as a consumer, you have a choice to make. You can pay what’s demanded from you, or you can request validation.

These unvalidated monetary demands are usually accompanied with threats, which makes them a form of extortion.

Extortionist in general cannot validate their demands, and the same applies to copyright abusers. So, that’s how you can put an end to their demands.

You are a consumer in such situations, and these entities all sell something dubious: they all sell protection from their harassment and extortion.

Mafia operates the same way. (Coming to think of it, because no records exist that the relevant original transactions ever happened, the copyright abusing business probably lends itself quite nicely to money laundering.)

The business model works so, that if you pay, you get the service, which is that they leave you alone and will not bother you any more. Although, they may come back and ask for more money. As far as I know, that has happened, too.

Their job is to sell you their service. As many sales people do, they look for targets that seem to be susceptible to their influence.

Many of them are on commission and that works essentially on variable ratio schedule of reinforcement. Every once in a while they get a big payoff, which then reinforces the behavior.

It is very unfortunate, that at least in my case, the U.S. Department of Education and its bill collector business partners operate the same way. (Here is an article that provides a more detailed comparison on Getty Images and U.S. Department of Education unvalidated demands operations.)

These companies may brainwash their employees into believing, that they do the right thing by making unvalidated monetary demands.

Entire groups of people can be brainwashed. Think of cults, for example. History has shown, that brainwashing can also be done on a very large scale. Think on Nazi Germany, for example. That’s not fictional. That’s all very real.

Further, people may believe all sorts of things, may have all sorts of opinions, and they may do all sorts of things for money. Beliefs and opinions are not substitutes for validation of demands. Unvalidated monetary demands usually end up being just that - not valid.

Here’s another aspect that can help to fight extortion. When an extortionist demands money from you, and in the process you are forced to work on a case that is intended to enrich the extortionist, you have the right to invoice the extortionist for usage of your unfree labor. To put it differently, you are for all practical purposes working for the extortionist in involuntary servitude conditions. (Never mind, that in the U.S. involuntary servitude is unconstitutional. Extortion is illegal as well, yet, it clearly is being practiced in a form of “legalized extortion.” The same applies to usage of involuntary servitude.)

Invoicing the extortionist can also help to end the unvalidated monetary demands.

As far as I am concerned, all means that are not illegal are acceptable when fighting extortion.

Of course, these extortionists are all blood sucking social parasites. We need a government that puts an end to such operating practices and focuses instead on creating value. That’s what has been missing from the picture for years: focus on creating value. Instead, comparatively more focus has been on trying to suck the life out where life exists.

Such operating practices will inevitably come to an end.

Letter to PicScout / License Compliance Services

  • The letter published below was delivered to Mr. Joel Miller, Sales & Account Manager, PicScout Inc., USPS Delivery Confirmation EK635224725US

Mr. Joel Miller, Sales & Account Manager

PicScout Inc.

605 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 400

Seattle, WA 98104

Mr. Miller:

I received from your company a demand for payment of $550.00 for an image that I am using on my personal website, (Case # 381146477, Ref: 4928-9660-5562). The part of your company that sent the monetary demands is “License Compliance Services,” which tries to disguise itself as an independent company, “License Compliance Services, Inc.” by using bogus information. Apparently, your company approves such operating practices.

Regarding this demand and your assumed client’s copyright infringement claim, by 10/12/15 please provide the following for the image in question:

  • (1) Verifiable proof that the entity or entities that you claim are the authors of the said image are indeed the authors of the said image. In particular, furnish copies of the registered copyrights that apply to the image that is used on my website.
  • (2) A written copy of a contract between your client and the alleged author or authors of the said image. Such written contract must clearly, unambiguously and conclusively demonstrate that your client represented the author or authors of the specific image in question during the time period when the image was furnished to me.
  • (3) Verifiable proof that the image in question has been available exclusively through your client from the moment the image was first used by any other party than the original author.
  • (4) Verifiable proof that the specific image in question that is used on my website had copyright management information included at the original source of the image at the time the image was obtained as is described below.
  • (5) Itemized and auditable list that shows how the $550.00 requested for the image in question was calculated.
  • (6) If you claim that your client and/or the copyright owner or owners of the said image have suffered damages as a result of my alleged actions, you must furnish relevant verifiable proof in accordance with 17 USC § 504 - Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits.
  • (7) Itemized and auditable list that demonstrates that you are asking for a reasonable compensation for the specific image, within the timeframe that the image has been used, and are not asking for exorbitant, unreasonable amounts of money under the circumstances.
  • (8) Verifiable proof that your office has been authorized to represent a case involving the image in question.
  • (9) Copy of your office business license in good standing.

Please note, that the proof furnished must cover the entire period of time that is relevant to this case. The Case Background subsection below contains additional relevant information. If the image in question is available exclusively through your client now, but was available through other sources in the past, your demands are baseless and will be considered to be acts of extortion.

Further, please note that your company made demands for payment. Thus, the burden of proof is on you.

Further, please note that this is an open letter that I will publish on the Internet, on so that it is accessible to the general public and to other institutions.

Case Background

Other than the photo of me, all the images on my website are either original images that represent my database work, or original collages that I have created, or images that were created based on my instructions.

Your correspondence refers to an image that I put on the Internet in September of 2011, after I had completed a creativity management project that I had been working on over several year period of time.

From 2006 to 2011 I worked with contractors on several website development projects. Some of this work is documented on

In 2009 I received over 100 images from contractors whose names, company and email addresses are listed below. In addition to assisting me with other website development tasks, these contractors conducted Internet searches for me for images, based on the criteria that I provided.

I paid the contractors for these services and specified, that all the images must be available free of charge without any usage restrictions, and inquired about the source of the images, to make sure that I am not in violation of any copyright laws. The sources of the images were:

These contractors keep their own libraries of free images and may have obtained the said images before 2009.

Contractors Who Furnished the Images

I did send Mr. Miller both the company name and website address, and names and emails of 4 people who were involved in rendering the web development and image obtaining services to me that I paid for. Because I do not have any reason to doubt the integrity of this company and its employees, I will not publish this company and employee information on this website.

Enclosed Invoice

Your company is making monetary demands, yet you did not include any verification that would validate your right to make such demands. As a result, your company is forcing me to work on a case that is intended to enrich your company through usage of unvalidated monetary demands. Accordingly, you are using my work in unfree labor conditions.

The enclosed invoice contains information on the compensation that your company owes me at this point in time for using my labor on a case that is intended to enrich your company. If you want to avoid paying interest on your debt to me, you must pay the full amount before the due date.

Please note, that full payment of the enclosed invoice does not release your company from harassment and extortion charges.

Your company’s employees may be unaware of your company’s usage of unfree labor. However, because of your company’s actions, your usage of unfree labor occurred regardless of knowledge or intent.

Please note, that full remittance of this invoice is your company’s responsibility regardless of any circumstances.

Your Company’s Suspected Extortionist Status on

Please note, that your company will be listed on as a suspected extortionist. Unless your company furnishes all the requested information by the specified date, your company will continue to be listed on as a suspected extortionist.

You can find more information on this case from under Anti-Extortion Case 2 and Anti-Extortion Case 3. The case involving your company is very similar and will also be published on

Please note, that in accordance with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, I reserve the right to post on the Internet my communication to you, which may also include quotations of your communication to me.

Image Usage

Unless you furnish the requested validation, demonstrating that you have the right to make any kinds of demands at all, I have absolutely no intention of even considering the removal of the image in question from my website.

Based on the information available to me at this point in time, the legitimacy of your company’s demands is questionable, to say the least.

However, please feel free to prove me wrong, and I will post a relevant public note on Until then, based on the available information, your company remains nothing but a suspected extortionist.

Further Interactions

Upon receipt of all of the above information and copies of the relevant documents, I will evaluate the evidence received.

If I agree that copyright infringement has occurred, I will proceed in accordance with 17 USC § 504. At that point you must identify, whether your client is seeking actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer, as provided by 17 USC § 504(b), or decides to seek statutory damages, as provided by 17 USC § 504(c).

In either case, you must specify the grounds for your monetary demands, and itemize in writing the calculations that add up the amount demanded.

If your client elects to seek actual damages, you must identify in writing the damages that are conclusively attributable to the case in question.

If your client elects to seek statutory damages, you must provide written conclusively proof that willful infringement has occurred. After you have provided the requested proof, I will review it and will inform you of my decision.

Please note, that If your company makes unvalidated monetary demands and keeps repeating them, then that may qualify as both harassment and extortion. Please note, that I reserve the right to take appropriate actions.

Furthermore, if your company’s further actions force me to do more work on this case in unfree labor conditions, I will continue to invoice your company for usage of my labor.

Until your company provides verifiable proof in all the relevant areas, do not contact me via mail, email, phone or in any other way. The same applies to the rest of your company and its employees and representatives. If you or anyone else from your company, or any representative of your company contacts me before the required proof has been provided, I will consider each such contacting instance to be an intentional act of harassment, in addition to being part of a fraud and extortion case under public investigation. If you, or anyone else from your company, or any representative of your company will knowingly perpetrate such acts of harassment, I reserve the right to legal action and holding both the individuals involved and your company liable for any damages caused, including possible emotional distress. Please note, that the expenses and damages that I may seek from you, including, but not limited to, the damages caused by possible emotional distress, may far exceed the claims that you and your client are making, or may make in the future.


Thomas Eklund

Views: 9385

Comment by Nelson Rafael on March 14, 2016 at 11:50am

Hi Thomas

Have they replied to your letter? Thanks

Comment by Thomas Eklund on March 14, 2016 at 9:03pm

No response. Haven't heard from them. They just moved on to the next victim.


You need to be a member of StopExtortion to add comments!

Join StopExtortion


Link to

If you find the information on this website useful, please link to

Your linking to this website can help other people to find it and, thus, can benefit people.

Thank you in advance for your help!




© 2022   Created by Stop Extortion, Inc..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service